IRS loses challenge to prove tax liability
Lawyer is acquitted after arguing income levy lacks legal foundation
Posted: July 26, 2007
By Bob Unruh
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
The Internal Revenue Service has lost a lawyer's challenge in front of a jury to prove a constitutional foundation for the nation's income tax, and the victorious attorney now is setting his sights higher.
"I think now people are beginning to realize that this has got to be the largest fraud, backed up by intimidation and extortion and by the sheer force of taking peoples property and hard-earned money without any lawful authorization whatsoever," lawyer Tom Cryer told WND just days after a jury in Louisiana acquitted him of two criminal tax counts.
And before you consign him to the legions of "tin foil hat brigades" who argue against paying taxes, and then want payment to explain how to do that, he addresses the issue up front. more
This is good. Again the IRS has been unable to state the statute for the power to tax personal income in front of a jury of his peers. The IRS is unable to provide the statute, because it doesn't exist. And it never has existed. He is not the first to be aquitted of all charges by a jury, but he is the latest, and whereas cases won previously were mainly to make the IRS cease and desist it's hounding of an individual "taxpayer" (I hate that term), Tom Cryer is on a mission.
This IRS tax fraud is part of "a carefully drawn federal statutory scheme" Judge Munley was referring to when he struck down the very reasonable Hazleton, Pa. town ordinance. Americans have been schemed for a long time now.
Cryer also argues:
"For example, the Constitution does not empower the federal government to regulate education, or employment, and agriculture, yet it does so."
We Americans must take back our government from the usurpers of power. The federal government has become a giant toad, eating everything in sight, including its young.
And speaking of taking back what the government has allowed the illegals to take from us, check out the 'Lone Protestor" over at Freedom Folks.
h/t to Consent of the Governed, which is a very good site to learn about homeschooling and other matters concerning education.
UPDATE - UPDATE
House votes for plan to free Ramos, Compean
Provision would prevent spending any funds to keep agents in prison
Posted: July 26, 2007
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
Ramos and Compean
The House of Representatives has attached two amendments to spending bills intended to free Border Patrol agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean from prison and prohibit the Department of Transportation from spending any funds on the development of NAFTA Superhighways.
Several congressmen are discussing a third amendment, designed to shut down the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America working groups in the Department of Commerce, but as yet no sponsor has been finalized.
The House of Representatives has attached two amendments to spending bills intended to free Border Patrol agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean from prison and prohibit the Department of Transportation from spending any funds on the development of NAFTA Superhighways.
Several congressmen are discussing a third amendment, designed to shut down the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America working groups in the Department of Commerce, but as yet no sponsor has been finalized.
Taken together these memos evidence a growing resistance in the House to open borders, prosecutions of law enforcement on the border, and the increasingly evident drive by the Bush administration to push North American integration.
NAFTA Superhighways
In a separate move, Hunter successfully offered an amendment to H.R. 3074, the Transportation Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2008, prohibiting the use of federal funds for participating in working groups under the Security and Prosperity Partnership, including the creation of NAFTA Superhighways.
Hunter's amendment passed 362 to 63, with strong bipartisan support. And the House later approved H.R. 3074 by 268-153, with the Hunter amendment included.
"The proposed NAFTA Superhighway presents significant challenges to our nation's security, the safety of vehicle motorists, and will likely drive down wages for American workers," Hunter said in a press release. "Much like NAFTA, the superhighway is designed to serve the interests of our trading partners and will lead to neither security nor prosperity." more
Trackbacked to: Dumb Ox Daily News, Freedom Folks, Woman Honor Thyself, Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson's Website, third world county, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Pirate's Cove, Stuck On Stupid, Cao's Blog, Leaning Straight Up, , and Conservative Cat, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, third world county, 123beta, Adam's Blog, Right Truth, Nuke's news and views, CommonSenseAmerica, and , thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
|